hhmx.de

Faith, Cyberwitch :v_tg: :v_lb: :v_greyace:

· Föderation EN Mo 19.08.2024 07:01:05

@Lana Also, like, why are we worried about that? The truly rich parents are paying more taxes and are likely paying for their kids lunch and like 3 other kids lunches. How is that even an argument?

Not that rich people should get more because they pay more taxes. No, that's dumb. Their kids will get exactly the same lunch as the poor kids. More that every one of those arguments hinges on a bunch of lower middle-class people who can barely afford to feed their own kids being super worried about spending a little bit more of the money that they mostly didn't pay for. It doesn't make any actual economic sense.

But it's a weird pride thing. I've listened to those arguments from my parents most of my life.

Pete Alex Harris🦡🕸️🌲/∞🪐∫

Föderation EN Mo 19.08.2024 09:08:04

@faithisleaping @Lana

Exactly. Universal benefits are the most efficient: they're all paid for from taxation assessed and collected once. They're *already means tested* by income tax rates.

Adding another layer of means testing is inefficient, and also double-dips the people who are paying for the thing but not getting it, which is just bad policy as well as bad politics.

U.Lancier

Föderation EN Mo 19.08.2024 14:54:23

@faithisleaping @Lana kids of truly rich families tend to go to private schools. So the motivation to have healthy and filling meals in public schools won't be of their concern.