hhmx.de

Dieses Fediverse-Konto und seine Inhalte werden nicht von hhmx.de verwaltet. Die kontoführende Instanz ist f.cz - die originale Adresse ist https://f.cz/@xChaos.

xChaos@f.cz
xChaos@f.cz

Chao-c'

(@xChaos@f.cz)

Di 15.11.2022

Beiträge: 12.220Folgt: 4.215Folgende: 1.847

Nedokončil studia na vysoké škole života. Mužský rod neživotný, tykej mi. Patřím do téhle části světa: 🇨🇿 🇪🇺 🇺🇦 🇬🇱

ADHD. ⁂ Moderator of f.cz. We recycle waste heat of our datacenter to heat water for 15 apartments.

SpráFce obsahu instance f.cz. Odpadní teplo datacentra ISP SPOJE.NET, kde tohle běží, ohřívá vodu 15 bytům. Solární cyklista, cestovatel. Linuxák, ex-programátor (Arachne), ex-muzikant. Fanoušek kosmického výzkumu, vědy a techniky. Zakládající člen Pirátů.

🐧 🚀 🐘 🚲

f.cz · mastodon · 2025-07-04 01:46:43

Föderation EN Mi 11.06.2025 10:11:46

I think the theoretical existence of "reply guys" on has very simple technical explanation.

The existing implementation in has critical flaw in displaying only small subset of replies to any given toot (status). This is because only subset of replies is shown: only those existing in already cached federated timeline are shown. This is typical example of state-of-the art primitive algorithm (actually: there is currently no algorithm, where there should be one: not shady and manipulating algorithm, but rather deterministic and transparent one).

And if we don't see all replies (which is true especially on small, self-hosted instances, which cache very limited subset of federated content), than we tend to answer. And because we don't see other like us, we don't know there are many like us explaining the same thing. And poor author of original toot sees it all - and don't understand, why we all repeat more or less the same thing. Why we don't just fav the other replies, like we did on Xitter? Well... because we don't see them! We would need to "open original page" each time we want to reply.

To make really useful tool of public discourse, we would need a chance to see all replies. Of course, we would like to apply our own sort criteria, not be manipulated by algorithm choosing "personalized best replies for us" like on late Xitter - but really, we need chance to see them all. Well, limitations may apply, like "only replies from first hour, only replies with most favs and boosts". But we need a chance to seem them all . Reply spam would become an issue, of course.

I wonder, if upcoming new releases of Mastodon are going to fix this issue... and to be true, it is not an easy engineering problem, as distributed information systems are really a hard problem. We are now merely confederated, we are not really federated.

Föderation CS So 18.08.2024 09:57:53

Místo obvyklého nedělního "silent sunday" spamování zenovými zátišími se dnes budu věnovat představování některých zajímavých uživatelských účtů na naší instanci . Přeci jen, máme jenom asi 50 aktivních uživatelů, zatímco já mám 1500+ sledujících (i když silně pochybuji, že aktivních jich bude víc, než několik stovek). Tyto zajímavé účty si tedy zaslouží, aby se o nich dozvědělo více lidí.

This thread is in Czech, because I believe, that most instances have some kind of automatic translation enabled.

Föderation EN Sa 29.06.2024 09:18:10

Why not just enable instance moderators to mark some of their existing lists as "starter packs" and offer them to newly registered users for automatic follow + list import at once? (Without need to save and import CSV manually...)

@mastodonmigration @Gargron @archos @davidslizek @kayla_eilhart @smoon @FediTips

1 > 2