Föderation EN Di 14.01.2025 23:21:27 If Hegseth wasn't such a gross abuser of women and alcohol, maybe there would be room to focus on his utter lack of qualifications to lead a large government department. |
Föderation EN Di 14.01.2025 23:28:06 @gleick sadly, it's a feature, not a bug |
Föderation EN Di 14.01.2025 23:29:08 @gleick ππ―π #NailedIt #HegsethIsUnfit |
Föderation EN Di 14.01.2025 23:42:33 @gleick and the fact that he already rolled over for blackmail. He's a national security risk. |
Föderation EN Di 14.01.2025 23:44:21 |
Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 00:30:06 @gleick Maybe after that we could talk about the fact heβs a Christian reconstructionist and a white supremacist with a history of apologizing for war criminals? |
Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 00:53:36 |
Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 01:05:18 @gleick it's a hell of a thing to hide behind |
Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 01:36:35 @gleick arguing about his morality will go no where with the Rs. If you want to peel off some R support, hammer Hegseth on his total lack of experience. Even if he was an Eagle Scout, he doesnβt have the skills or experience to do the job. Let 1 or 2 of the Ds push the morality issue. The rest should have just constantly drilled on the experience point. Make the Rs squirm to defend him on the merits of the job. |
Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 02:12:14 |