· Föderation EN Mi 04.10.2023 01:24:56
@feditips @saket
Yes! The new server should handle the toots of its users. Maybe they should charge them for it. Regarding being a sudden event the new server can report the progress and take its time.
I'm just trying to state that this is a real issue and you should admit it to be able to move forward.
Föderation EN Mi 04.10.2023 01:46:31
"The new server should handle the toots of its users. Maybe they should charge them for it. "
If the alternatives are either pay to move your posts or leave them on the old server with a redirect for free, I am guessing the vast majority of people will choose the redirect.
Plus it's not just about the storage costs but the time.
I have almost six thousand posts on my account. If I move servers, how will the new server's admin have time to go through all those?
Föderation EN Mi 04.10.2023 06:46:49
Föderation EN Mi 04.10.2023 15:31:07
@feditips @hadilq @saket yes, it's strange to me too. Why the new server cannot handle that load!. Also I don't understand why the old server should keep the toots of moved accounts. It's not cost free to keep them. With current model we're forcing them to remove old posts, or other similar decisions, which makes Mastodon an unreliable solution.
Föderation EN Mi 04.10.2023 16:39:52
" Are we saying that servers will not be able to handle the load of migrated posts? Doesn't this sound strange considering they're able to handle the posts of their existing just fine?"
Load building up gradually is okay, load suddenly appearing overnight causes problems.
"which makes Mastodon an unreliable solution."
There is no "reliable" solution when you're storing data on other people's servers. See https://www.forbes.com/sites/mattnovak/2023/08/19/twitter-deletes-all-user-photos-and-links-from-2011-2014/, https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/mar/18/myspace-loses-all-content-uploaded-before-2016 and many others...
