· Föderation EN So 05.01.2025 01:18:00 @drahardja Pure speculation: I wonder if this was a deliberate design choice, where the developers were concerned about thwarting hostile edge cases. Imagine this reply chain (A→B→C): If B is deleted (either voluntarily or by moderation), if C's reply still appeared in the thread, it might seem like an unwarranted response to A (thus feeding the fire). I don't know if my speculation is correct, and would be curious to learn the history in any case. But that's the rationale that occurred to me. |
Föderation EN So 05.01.2025 03:05:26 @marilyn I don’t think it’s intentional, because if B were deleted there should be a tombstone in its place (i.e. “This post was deleted”), so it should be clear on clients that C was a reply to a deleted post. I think this is a blind spot in the spec. The tombstone is synced around today, but it doesn’t carry the back-pointer to the post it was referring to. |