Hhmx.de * hhmx.de

Nordnick 🐘

Föderation DE Mo 12.08.2024 12:25:18

@pachli@mastodon.social

Hi #Pachli, Hi Nik,

regarding the current Pachli 2.7.1 i have the feeling, there may be an issue regarding the display of the used app information.

Two fields in the #API response: application[name] and application[website].

If application[name] is set, but application[website] is not (it's nullable), it looks like the application[name] is not shown in Pachli.

Could you verify that? TIA.

CC @nikclayton@mastodon.social

P.S.: First seen with #Mammuthus as instance server type, but also found one sample from an instance using #Mastodon.

0x 1 0x

Nik
@nikclayton@mastodon.social

Föderation EN Mo 12.08.2024 15:09:14

@nick Pachli code for this looks OK to me.

If I fetch the post I'm replying to -- https://mastodon.social/api/v1/statuses/112948564379350406 -- there's no application metadata in the response.

Contrast this with a Pachli post like https://mastodon.social/api/v1/statuses/112892161702632611, which does have the application metadata.

So I think either mastodon.social is removing it, or mammuthus.de isn't sending it.

0x 1 0x

Nordnick 🐘

Nordnick 🐘
@nick@mammuthus.de

Föderation DE Di 13.08.2024 13:59:51

@nikclayton@mastodon.social

The information about the used app isn't federated.

So you can just see this on local posts.

#Pachli looks okay for me, when no application is given.

And it looks okay, when application[name] and application[website] is given.

But if just application[name] is given, Pachli seems to display a leading mid dot, but no further information (expected would be the application[name]).

0x 1 0x

Nordnick 🐘

Nordnick 🐘
@nick@mammuthus.de

Föderation DE Do 15.08.2024 11:34:47

@nikclayton@mastodon.social

You may want to check this sample (hopefully found a good one on mastodon.social):

https://mastodon.social/@chrispackham/112965326252746380

https://mastodon.social/api/v1/statuses/112965326252746380

[application] => Array
(
[name] => Web
[website] =>
)

0x 1 0x