hhmx.de

ophiocephalic 🐍

· Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 17:09:22

@sl007
Thanks for your comment and the links. A couple of points here.

First, note that my critique is not directed against the SWICG; the SWF is an independent foundation.

Second, while it's true that "AI" is not currently referenced in the SWF's mission statement or initial project goals, it's also true that the blog post I link to was published on the SWF's website, not one associated with the FOF initiative. Further, the post was written by one of the 3 core members of SWF. I find this to be sufficient cause to shoot off a warning flare.

It is certainly a direct statement of intent to involve LLMs more deeply into the AT protocol, even as the Bluesky community itself is largely as contemptuous of "AI" as the fedi community is. And considering the established technical leanings of all of the SWF core members - crypto, monetization, the proposal of ads in the fediverse - vigilance is clearly warranted

@matt

Sebastian Lasse

Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 19:41:15

@ophiocephalic @matt

What I meant is that the SWF has no power when it comes to the spec.

I see your warning. But I think it is better to attend SWICG meetings cause it might depend on your vote :)
Thanks for the warning.

ophiocephalic 🐍

Föderation EN Mi 15.01.2025 19:50:36

@sl007
Agree - the process of furthering the protocol should be more, rather than less, democratic!

@matt