hhmx.de

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 19:59:38

After Amazon's news this week,
I feel the need to share this advice from my Privacy Guides article again:

Notify guests if you are
using a smart speaker 🔇

If you are using a smart speaker device in your home such as Amazon's Echo (Alexa), Apple's HomePod (Siri), Google's Nest,

Inform your guests about it when they enter your home ⚠️

These devices have the capacity
to record all conversations, and there has already been instances of accidental privacy invasion reported about this 🔓

Even if you don't mind yourself,
offer your guests to UNPLUG your smart speaker while they are visiting you 🔌

privacyguides.org/articles/202

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 20:30:37

@Em0nM4stodon what about the phone in everyone’s pocket?

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 20:43:27

@airshipper Also mentioned in the article :)

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 20:37:31

@Em0nM4stodon the novelty of any such device should be dwarfed by the insane level of invasiveness they represent.

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 21:34:26

@Em0nM4stodon Amen.

Even if the company is ethical, they can still get hacked.
Even if they have decent security they can get subpoenaed.

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 21:39:20

@dandylyons @Em0nM4stodon People seem to have some idea that some companies just are unhackable. *CoughAppleCough*

Of course in reality companies have discovered a really simple answer to that: if they get hacked they just simply don't tell anyone.

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 21:45:46

@nazokiyoubinbou @Em0nM4stodon

There’s a little more nuance than that.

If they don’t disclose at all then sooner or later a security researcher will find the vulnerability and that will hurt their sales and therefore their bottom line.

But if they disclose too early, before the vulnerability has been patched, then put all their users at greater risk.

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 21:50:35

@dandylyons @Em0nM4stodon All things in life have more nuance than just a single black and white answer, yes. There are character (and time/patience) limits, so no I don't launch into a full page when responding to posts.

But what you're describing now refers to deployed software/hardware vulnerabilities. Yeah, that will usually get disclosed because it has to. But aren't we talking about things such as internal company databases? They generally don't have to disclose such things at all and, in fact, I've seen them get punished by people for doing so. (Target telling people that the company that processed cards getting hacked being a great example. None of the other companies affected during that period said a single word...)

If Apple gets hacked, they're not going to tell us.

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 00:09:52

@nazokiyoubinbou @dandylyons @Em0nM4stodon This myth was heavily flogged by Apple on their way up, during the PC/Mac wars (which they also mostly invented, also for their own gain). It had a grain of truth to it: INCIDENTS of malware and hacking were much lower for Mac than for PC at the time. But that had nothing to do with any special or magical attributes of Mac, and instead everything to do with the fact that Apple had only 5% market share at the time, so black-hats didn't bother with it.

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 20:21:24

@wesdym @dandylyons @Em0nM4stodon This is a very good point in regards to deployed hardware/software, but what I'm really referring to here are the companies themselves. Eg their databases and records and such. People give so much information to these companies and just assume it's safe. I wouldn't be shocked if Apple's databases even could have things like SSNs and such in there.

Even assuming companies like these do every single thing within their power to protect this stuff the absolute best they possibly can, all it takes is one hack/leak for some serious personal info to get out there.

Besides even Apple is flirting with "AI" stuff now and we all know how companies get regarding our private info the instant LLM training gets involved.

Föderation EN So 16.03.2025 21:50:33

@Em0nM4stodon Won’t have one in my home. I may be paranoid, but that doesn’t mean that the bastards aren’t out to get me.

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 05:16:28

@Em0nM4stodon is an android phone or iPhone substantially different from a smart speaker, surveillance-wise? Are they listening less?

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 09:57:11

@Em0nM4stodon

A sign that said: "Smart Speaker(s)" in Use" would be cool, sign are always cool... ( I like them).

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 10:07:13

@Em0nM4stodon

Some sings here...

Medien: 2

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 16:51:32

@oscarfalcon Ohhhh I love that idea so much!!🤩

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 17:11:41

@oscarfalcon @Em0nM4stodon I prefer to call them "Capitalist Microphones" since...that's really the problem, not the speaker part.

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 17:48:22

@edolnx @Em0nM4stodon

I totally get that, I'm using "techno-vernacular" for simplicity...

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 17:52:37

@oscarfalcon Totally fair. Maybe '"Smart" Listening Devices' (emphasis on the quoted smart) makes more sense then?

Föderation EN Di 18.03.2025 01:24:01

@edolnx

Updated SIGNS....

Medien: 2

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 18:15:02

@oscarfalcon @Em0nM4stodon This is great! I'd love to have a standardized set of icons for this.

I can picture having a sign saying "No smart speakers, no IOT devices, no cloud cameras, Yes DNS black hole on premises", as an opposite concept as well.

I already have a QR code for our Wifi connection, could be added alongside that

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 13:49:43

@Em0nM4stodon Just don't use them. Nobody needs one. Case closed.

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 17:03:27

@Em0nM4stodon this post is killing me bc its making me think of the mega rich i watched fall all over themselves to do drug deals only on signal but then leave the fucking alexa pod on in the house theyre doing it at

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 20:02:20

@Em0nM4stodon I wish people would extend this idea to corporate email services and all the other surveilled ways they require others to communicate with them by.

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 20:03:24

@Em0nM4stodon an always useful approach as a guest is outlined here:

xkcd.com/1807/

“Thanks for inviting us over!”
“Alexa, offer two tons of creamed corn.”
“Alexa, confirm purchase.”

Föderation EN Mo 17.03.2025 20:43:33

@thousandleaves @Em0nM4stodon I always found this particular XKCD super meaningful and I keep trying to do it to people who I know have always on listening devices (albeit usually Apple) but I guess they have sufficient voice recognition or something to prevent this specific trick from working.

That said, many such devices do at least indicate the detection of their trigger phrase with some sort of tone, even if they refuse to work. It's still a good reminder that some device nearby is listening and potentially phoning home with your conversations.