|
· Föderation EN Mi 19.02.2025 18:16:42 @petergleick In my opinion your 'mainstream' media intentionally excludes conservative voices and reports mostly social/left viewpoints. This will make the issue so much worse. E.g. Margaret Brennan recently said that free speech led to the Holocaust. What? No correction, no sorry. I have no respect for that. If a medium strongly alienates conservative viewers, of course they won't even listen to the science. And most conservative media won't show it at all. The US media is incredibly biased. |
|
Föderation EN Mi 19.02.2025 18:22:17 @FatimaShamsAref @petergleick To the extent that conservative viewers are inculcated with religion, they are lost to science no matter what. A person capable of believing that the fable of Noah's Ark is literally true will never be able to understand the philosophical underpinnings of science. |
|
Föderation EN Mi 19.02.2025 18:28:05 @gpilz If someone believes that all stories in any book written by a human are true, then they obviously don't believe in science. But that is not what I am referring to. I am referring to any even non-religious conservatives refusing to watch these left-leaning channels because they are very biased. Science has to be neutral to work for both sides. Global warming denial does not exist because humans are just too stupid to listen to smart humans. Many just fail to neutrally present the facts. |
|
Föderation EN Mi 19.02.2025 18:31:06 @FatimaShamsAref @petergleick no it doesn't. This is complete nonsense. |
|
Föderation EN Mi 19.02.2025 18:32:22 @noodlemaz Sure. Any media bias rating organization rating CNN, MSNBC, CBS left is lying then? |
|
Föderation EN Mi 19.02.2025 20:04:11 Correct, and what you are posting is complete nonsense. |
|
Föderation EN Mi 19.02.2025 20:22:58 blocked |
