hhmx.de

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 15:44:28

It’s incredibly sad that we’ve lost the open, federated team chat space to —where the only viable server isn’t open source, it’s debatable whether the underlying standard is truly open, and the most charitable thing I’ve heard about the UX is that it’s 'OK.'

Föderation · So 09.02.2025 15:48:03

You can always host your own homeserver with synapse & theres one alternative I forgot the name.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 15:49:03

@daniel to be fair, while I agree with your other points, I'm also pretty sure (with apologies to the other client authors, who suffer from the normal lack of funding/participation, not their fault) that Conversations is the only app that supports XMPP that has a decent UI too. I think I would honestly take one client per platform that was "OK" over that.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 15:59:37

@sam There's also Dino.

But that's pretty much it.

@daniel

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 16:01:12

@drq @daniel yah, Dino's what I use. It's probably the closest after Conversations, but the UX leaves a lot to be desired and there are lots of little UI issues (ie. don't use it for a day or two, then enable it… your entire screen will be covered with notifications and everything will lock up while all the chats flicker new messages constantly as it downloads everything said in every chat room you've ever missed). Also adding contacts and starting chats is pretty hidden, etc.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 18:28:38

@sam
Gajim was nice, but the UI became less usable after they redesigned the buddy list view. But feature-wise, I don't know a better desktop client.
I'd wish Pidgin would implement the important XEPs for modern XMPP. Or maybe PSI could make a comeback.

@daniel

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 15:53:22

@daniel

> It’s incredibly sad that we’ve lost the open, federated team chat space

This should be the end of the message.

XMPP as it stands in terms of server and client software is not up to par either, regarding team communication.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 16:00:11

@daniel 15 years ago or so I was looking for a decent web client for XMPP to offer to my users. I think there was or still is a major lack of such web clients. Haven't checked for many years now.

Föderation DE So 09.02.2025 16:29:05

@fluchtkapsel @daniel I’m putting a lot of hope into upcoming @prose

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 17:15:26

@fluchtkapsel@nerdculture. you can try movim though

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 18:34:11

@fluchtkapsel Have you tried converse.js?

Have a look at the screenshots here:
github.com/conversejs/converse

It is a pure Javascript application that can connect to any XMPP server that has bosh enabled.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 18:59:37

@allo Converse seems to have grown since I deployed it back then.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 16:02:08

@daniel "OK" is an overstatement

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 16:09:21

@daniel would you like to EEE matrix? we can do that.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 17:03:13

@daniel Are you saying you should have wan or are you saying is even worse ?

Föderation EN Mo 10.02.2025 01:35:25

@bhyoram XMPP currently doesn't even compete in the team chat game. So yes, despite the many many flaws Matrix has, XMPP is worse in the team chat space.

For WhatsApp replacement / personal chat I much prefer though.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 18:39:52

@daniel Would you be willing to elaborate some? I recently deployed a matrix server for personal use and it seems viable to me? Genuinely curious to understand your perspective.

Föderation EN Mo 10.02.2025 01:31:38

@alex Probably fine for family sized teams. Doesn't scale for any larger teams (they recently wrote a blog post about that).
I believe you when you say it covers your 'personal chat' / WhatsApp use case. XMPP has that covered too, (And I much prefer XMPP for personal chat) but I'm specifically talking about team chat here.

Föderation EN So 09.02.2025 19:07:14

@daniel XMPP never had that space. It was vacant and filled with (not really federated but at least open) IRC until Matrix tried to strong-arm itself into the niche with their terrible IRC bridge (a poisioned gift that many IRC networks swallowed).

I think there are some interesting new efforts like GC3 and Prose in that space, but XMPP has a long way to go in that regard.

Föderation · So 09.02.2025 19:32:39

@daniel As a concept a messaging system built around a database could be valuable for niche uses, but most ‘real’ IM conversations I encounter are (unfortunately) on WhatsApp, and feature potholes, lost pets, family concerns and fun, and so on, None of these need to be protected against an adversary who might want to re-write their history, and were it not for the ‘But everyone uses WhatsApp’ would work as well on XMPP. There may be (I have not looked into it) similar concerns related to traffic analysis in Matrix as there are in WhatsApp

Föderation EN Mo 10.02.2025 02:04:56

Synapse is entirely viable and FOSS under AGPL. The standard is indeed truly open, despite the FUD. Protocols don't have UX, but just as Conversations has great UX for XMPP, there are several clients which have great UX for Matrix. Perhaps focus on improving XMPP rather than complaining about Matrix? 😘

Föderation EN Mo 10.02.2025 09:03:31

@matrix this post has been sponsored by Synapse Pro, now with 1% more Rust!