Föderation EN So 09.06.2024 19:09:08 Let's be honest: an accessible PDF is still a shit way to consume information. |
Föderation EN So 09.06.2024 19:47:34 @jscholes Yes, we need more epub and md |
Föderation EN Mo 10.06.2024 00:32:01 @jscholes couldn't agree more |
Föderation EN Mo 10.06.2024 04:12:43 @jscholes HTML alternatives are always better in my opinion. Yes there is JAWS OCR, or VoiceOver Recognition and am sorry but I don’t know about Android but I would bet a similar solution exists or will exist soon. However just chuck it into HTMl and tag it and its a win win. On a larger scale of-course where financial institutions and others use PDF by default They would likely need to get around the electronic signature thing. However again simply asking someone to type or tick a box to indicate they agree to whatever it is can still be done securely by generating secure links, or using various methods of authentication which exist now. Unfortunately though I don’t sea PDF going anywhere soon. Although as you gathered I agree. ☺️ |
Föderation EN Mo 10.06.2024 08:14:02 @jscholes A new medium in the beginning always mimics its predecessor. TV programs in the beginning were just radio hosts reading their paper being filmed. Early cars looked like horse-drawn carriages without a horse. |
Föderation EN Mo 10.06.2024 21:25:42 @jscholes I absolutely agree with you, and yet I don't know of an alternative that is any better. HTML is a mess for offline use, and it doesn't even have proper forms that can be saved back into the file and work without an internet connection, not to mention European-style signatures. No browser supports epub natively, and even if you have any (mainstream) program that can open it, it probably treats it as an ebook and tries adding it to a library. Docx is proprietary and much less frictionless than PDF. |
Föderation EN Mo 10.06.2024 23:14:40 @miki Offline use, inline form filling, and electronic signatures are three distinct classes of problem that should be solved separately. For the case where I buy or otherwise have access to a read-only document that requires none of those, HTML is a fine alternative. And that was mainly what my post was about: large documents from which I only wish to consume content, but are nevertheless distributed as PDF. It can be perfectly tagged, and pass every manual and automated accessibility check thrown at it. I'll still need to work out why Acrobat is only letting me view one page at a time, and be realistically limited to reading it on a computer. |