@leeloo For now, by default, the minimum font-size will be just defined `font-size`. An author, of course, could shoot themselves in a foot by defining it as 5pt, but by default the minimum font-size for longer text strings should be good enough. Shorter translated strings for ideographic characters is an interesting case. By default, yes, it can potentially bump up the block dimensions significantly if the translated string will be very short.

Thanks for bringing the translation point!

@zachleat @kizu @davatron5000 CSS is PowerPoint-complete! 🙌😁

@zachleat @kizu [hallelujah plays in background]

@AmeliaBR My original proposal was only about adjusting the font-size (as a starter), but both in the issue and in the meeting it was brought up that we could want to adjust other things as well.

Font-size is probably the simplest, letter-spacing being also simple to distribute, but for some other variable axis and adjustments it could be more complicated and will require more research over what the algorithm for them could look like.

@matuzo Thanks! One issue: in the comments of the issue it was brought up that the feature will violate https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/#resize-text — and I don't think there is any world where this issue can be implemented in a way it would not, with the way the SC is written right now. I am not sure if we can do anything about it aside from somehow changing the SC in the future. If you have any thoughts about this, I'll be happy to hear them :)

@nachtfunke I am taking it seriously, but I don't see how this can be unblocked aside from changing the SC :\

It feels like a pointless technicality that benefits no one and does not bring any value for any real users. Like, all the other alternatives (using viewport units, existing fit-to-text implementations with JS, images) are worse in every regard.