hhmx.de

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 09:47:17

» a instance [] is a one-step process, and you then . To get the same experience with [], you’ll need to spend or of a month, and even then you still don’t control everything as of today.« eicker.news/@technews/11349433

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 10:33:52

@gerrit

And you could also use something else (lot of based software exist) or even create your own.

See also (in German):
hhmx.de/@nick/905102

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 10:40:45

@nick No doubt, but we should also remember that is much older and is far from being “finished.”

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 10:47:42

@gerrit @nick

well, I guess what @nick means is that hosting mastodon is a "is a one-step process" but for people doing media also the first step.

There should be "no gap" between your eicker.news content and a mastodon instance. Online Journalism really must think the web forward and dev. new things with Open Protocols apart from using http as a paper stack.

E.g. we described what we build at Berlin Fediday in a hurry in german youtube.com/live/Ieihyq3JbWs?s
A broader perspective is in the Talk for Public Spaces [EN] video.publicspaces.net/w/9USsJ or the book [DE] socialmediafalle.de/

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 10:51:35

@sl007 @nick In any case, it should be the first step. Unfortunately, very few people have understood so far how important platform independence is. And it feels like this is simply because most haven’t realized that it doesn’t come for free — and that centralized platforms are not truly “free.”

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 11:56:14

@gerrit @sl007

I wanted to mention, that you can also chose something "smaller" to start an based instance. And if you want to dive into the tech stuff, it is possible (also for a single person). So i agree, that needs less resources.

And yes, getting out of "Slave Media" is an important step to understand and do!

So, as almost always, many things to consider...

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 12:16:15

@nick @sl007 And yet, the (still) centralized platform is attracting more people, even those who have just sensibly decided against . — Is - as a - actually worse, or is it simply that the for Mastodon is too poor?

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 12:41:02

@gerrit @sl007

Several stuff to consider, i would guess.

* Advertising
* Presence in the media
* The simple approach: Just ... nothing else.
* ...

Similar regarding ...

is part of the ... so already this may sound more complex. What does this mean? Where to register? And even reducing it to ... it is federated... and the Mastodon company is a small one... even with starting now first merchandising.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 12:44:22

@nick @sl007 So it’s actually a product problem?

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 12:49:03

@gerrit @sl007

Don't think so...

... would guess, more a matter of communication and awareness.

People handle federated systems like e-mail or the phone network without problems.

The isn't driven by a large company doing advertising, public relations, lobbying and all that stuff.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 12:52:21

@nick @sl007 So what needs to be done first?

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 14:03:49

@gerrit @sl007

That's a question, that isn't easy to give an answer to... 😉

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 14:06:38

@nick @sl007 I rarely ask simple questions. 😇 My current impression is that no one is currently addressing this question strategically or at least tactically.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 15:54:54

@gerrit @sl007

The nature of federation... it is a peer to peer network... no central leader... so everyone can take actions... or no one...

... and obviously there could exist a lot of opinions about that topic.

Would be nice, if someone would have good contacts to the media etc.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 16:37:32

@nick @sl007 Mastodon is now 8 1/2 years old. It’s quite clear that the communication hasn’t worked in a way that would generate significant traction beyond a small group; approximately 1M regular Mastodon users out of 5.4B internet users.

The decentralized communication of these users (if it even occurs!) is obviously not enough. For instance, I mention Mastodon disproportionately on eicker.TV. But that’s not an adequate strategy, at best it’s just nice communication.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 16:42:35

@nick @sl007 Oh, and what I regularly notice is that Mastodon has a surprisingly bad reputation. There are frequent comments from people saying how condescendingly they were welcomed on Mastodon, which made them leave again (I have no idea which side was responsible for that, of course). And on top of that, the CSEM issue still lingers in the minds of some people when they think of Mastodon.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 18:07:57

@gerrit

In this case, what do you mean with ? The software, their developers, a specific instance, the as a network of thousands of independent servers?

And CSEM? Are you referring to "Child sexual exploitation material"? Which issue?

@sl007

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 18:18:55

@nick @sl007 I suspect the instances and users those people first encountered when they came into contact with »Mastodon.«

Yes, CSEM/CSAM, and the accusation isn’t unfounded, though ultimately unavoidable in any decentralized network: theverge.com/2023/7/24/2380609

In any case, it’s something that has obviously stuck with many people – and is repeatedly brought up by opponents especially from the Musk camp.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 19:45:05

@gerrit

Usually instance operators will defederate such instances like it was done with Gab in 2019.

And obviously not wanted content is not limited to federated networks.

social.heise.de/@heiseonline/1

@sl007

Föderation DE Mo 18.11.2024 09:16:03

@nick @sl007 Of course not, but the image problem is primarily attached to Mastodon. Maybe because there’s no - widely influential - positive narrative. Maybe because opponents keep spreading it. In any case, pointing fingers at others doesn’t help Mastodon at all.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 18:05:09

@gerrit @sl007

The software is developed since 2016, yes. for example since 2010. The started approx. in 2008.

But this isn't the story of a company with a large budget or venture capital.

So difficult to compare.

Btw.: I see on eicker.tv, that you mention , , , , , . Not a single platform.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 18:23:24

@nick @sl007 Maybe that’s exactly the problem? Without small and large companies, the internet might also have become an irrelevant niche in the media landscape.

Besides: So far, the Fediverse hasn’t really supported vertical short videos. I’m participating in the TestFlight for Loops and am curious to see where it leads.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 19:48:04

@gerrit @sl007

The is part of the ... and someone might see it to be more original internet spirit than large companies... ;-)

Heard about ... done by the developer, if i remember correctly.

Föderation DE So 17.11.2024 19:57:42

@nick @sl007 In 1994, I had internet access for the very first time. Great spirit, but not very sophisticated.

It only became truly exciting — even for the vast majority of people who had ignored it before — with the vast amount of money from VCs and corporations.

Spirit is nice, but probably not enough for most people?

Loops’ public beta has only just begun; and indeed, it’s from Pixelfed. But as far as I understand, it’s not based on ActivityPub yet.

Föderation EN Mo 18.11.2024 09:15:01

@nick @gerrit @sl007 The "closed beta" buzz certainly also helped.

Föderation DE Mo 18.11.2024 09:19:03

@claudius @nick @sl007 Probably. But Mastodon really can’t dig up that marketing tool anymore. What seems more important to me is a continuous positive narrative, but unfortunately, that simply doesn’t exist. Apparently, no one seems interested in that. Maybe not even in the growth of the platform?

Tusky DE Mo 18.11.2024 10:42:25

@gerrit@eicker.news @nick@norden.social @sl007@digitalcourage.social @claudius@darmstadt.social

is just one type of server software to run an instance in the .

So it is not the platform, it is not the network.

Also someone who operates a instance using the software is not Mastodon itself.

Föderation DE Mo 18.11.2024 10:50:37

@nick@hhmx.de @nick@norden.social @sl007 @claudius None of this is new. However, Mastodon is undoubtedly the most well-known software in the Fediverse.

Anyway, where is this kind of argumentation supposed to lead? That Mastodon, the Fediverse, and thus ActivityPub remain a tiny niche forever?

Tusky DE Di 19.11.2024 07:33:01

@gerrit@eicker.news @nick@norden.social @sl007@digitalcourage.social @claudius@darmstadt.social

This shouldn't be new, but i had the feeling, some information was missing.

Föderation DE Di 19.11.2024 07:47:35

@nick@hhmx.de @nick@norden.social @sl007 @claudius This is probably what others mean by that attitude mentioned above: , , is technically/structurally simple to understand and therefore requires no explanation.

What does, however, need to be explained is the potential advantage of this technology compared to alternatives. And even more importantly: the simple of these as an advantage in everyday lives!