Cliff (@cliffwade@allthingstech.social)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 15:08:49
@jcrabapple WHOA! Those prices are absolutely INSANE compared to something like Masto.Host that offers similar stuff for WAY WAY cheaper.
Example, SpaceHost wants $106 a month for 100 users when MastoHost does it for $40.
Jcrabapple ๐ (@jcrabapple@dmv.community)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 15:09:39
@CliffWade yeah I don't know why it's so much more expensive.
Cliff (@cliffwade@allthingstech.social)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 15:10:24
@jcrabapple Yeah, that's just insane. Ain't no way I personally would recommend them to anyone at those prices. That's seriously a rip off.
Jcrabapple ๐ (@jcrabapple@dmv.community)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 15:17:02
@CliffWade I wonder where they're hosting it. I know Masto.host uses OVH.
Cliff (@cliffwade@allthingstech.social)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 15:18:59
@jcrabapple Yeah I'm curious about that as well. And isn't this the one that Chris Trottier is involved with?
Jcrabapple ๐ (@jcrabapple@dmv.community)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 15:33:24
@CliffWade I think so.
ikuturso (@ikuturso@mastodon.social)
Föderation EN Di 07.05.2024 12:14:13
@jcrabapple @CliffWade It looks like this is hosted on DigitalOcean. OVH is a very budget hosting option so that explains some of it and they also probably benefit much more from economies of scale at this point.
shellsharks (@shellsharks@shellsharks.social)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 16:42:07
@jcrabapple @cliffwade It does seem a little pricy doesnโt it? Perhaps it is due to...
- They host/support A LOT of different platforms. This complexity (unlike masto.host) probably means extra cost.
- They are also much newer, Masto.host has things pretty smoothed out, automated, etc... probably helps reduce cost compared to spacehost
- Probably better to over-price to start and lower it from there rather than be forced to raise prices on people later?
Cliff (@cliffwade@allthingstech.social)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 16:43:35
@shellsharks The offering of so many services could certainly be it. However, if I click on Mastodon, and go with the 100 user plan, I still don't think that alone should be $106. I'm not saying it needs to be dirt cheap, but I think that $106 is just too much.
shellsharks (@shellsharks@shellsharks.social)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 16:45:28
@cliffwade @jcrabapple Yeah agreed. Hard to swallow that price knowing how reliable and cheap the MH offering is.
Martin Guay ๐จโ๐ป๐๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ (@MartinGuay@mstdn.ca)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 16:57:19
Depending on your needs, you could theoretically and if you have the network capacity host your own instance at home if you have some spare hardware. I'm considering this as a project...
Jcrabapple ๐ (@jcrabapple@dmv.community)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 17:02:26
@MartinGuay @CliffWade @shellsharks yes but given the context we're talking about services that host it for you because you don't want to deal with it.
ikuturso (@ikuturso@mastodon.social)
Föderation EN Di 07.05.2024 12:21:54
@CliffWade @jcrabapple Masto.Host is still almost certainly cheaper but I do think they use a slightly different metric for users since SpaceHost is talking about "average users" and Masto.Host is talking about "active users".
Active users in a Mastodon context probably refers to the number reported by Mastodon, which is defined as anyone having even logged in within a month. Average users sounds like it refers to concurrent users on the site at any point in time, on average.
StarrWulfe (JLGatewood) (@starrwulfe@social.vivaldi.net)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 16:18:11
@jcrabapple
Make sure @fediversereport and @FediTips know!
Fedi.Tips (@FediTips@social.growyourown.services)
Föderation EN Mo 06.05.2024 20:10:08
Could you message my other account @homegrown? That's focused on people hosting their own servers ๐
Chief335 (@chief335@hub.netzgemeinde.eu)
Föderation · Do 09.05.2024 07:19:08